Selected Decisions Obtained by The Dugger Law Firm, PLLC

 

Douglas v. 643 Broadway Holdings LLC d/b/a Bleecker Kitchen & Co., Index No. 162179/14 (March 1, 2016)

The Court granted, in close to its entirety, The Dugger Law Firm, PLLC’s motion to compel documents concerning the plaintiff’s racially hostile work environment claim under the New York City Human Rights Law.

Agerbrink v. Model Serv. LLC, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12486 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2016)

The Court granted the Dugger Law Firm, PLLC’s motion for conditional certification and court-authorized notice for a FLSA collective of exclusive MSA fit models.  The Court approved the provision of notice of the lawsuit to the collective by U.S. mail and email, and also approved a reminder notice.

Agerbrink v. Model Serv. LLC, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1792 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 7, 2016)

The Court granted The Dugger Law Firm, PLLC’s motion to amend its putative class and collective action wage and hour complaint to: (1) add MSA Models’ Chief Operating Officer as an individual defendant; (2) add a claim for unjust enrichment concerning Defendants’ purported liquidated damages provision; and (3) expand the putative class from only fit models to all MSA models with respect to the claim for unjust enrichment.  

Agerbrink v. Model Serv. LLC, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145563 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 27, 2015)

The Court granted The Dugger Law Firm, PLLC’s motion for a corrective notice and additional relief based on a misleading communication from the Chief Operating Officer of defendant MSA Models to members of the putative class and collective.  The Court ordered: (1) MSA Models’ Chief Operating Officer to send a corrective notice to members of the putative class; (2) MSA Models’ Chief Operating Officer to produce all prior correspondence with members of the putative class concerning the litigation; and (3) MSA Models to put all future communications with members of the putative class concerning the litigation in writing.